PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

List price, net price, coupon price — which one am I actually paying, and how do I model 12 months?

Asked 21 Apr 2026Modified 32 days agoViewed 18k times
17

I have now seen four different prices for the same product quoted as though each were the real one: a list price in the region of $1,300 a month, a "net price" figure someone cited from an industry report that was less than half of that, a manufacturer cash price around $500, and a copay card claiming $25.

These cannot all be the price. I assume they are prices to different parties at different points in the chain, and that the one I pay depends on facts about my own plan that I have not worked out yet.

Second question, and the one I actually need for budgeting: how do I model a full twelve months including titration? Every calculator I have found assumes the maintenance dose from day one, which cannot be right — the first four months are at lower doses, so the drug quantity is much lower, but the monthly price seems to be flat regardless of dose. I would like to do this properly for both a semaglutide and a tirzepatide schedule.

cost-analysis
cost-analysis

Cost arithmetic done honestly: cost per milligram after dead-space loss, list versus net price, comparing a multi-dose vial to a fixed-dose pen,…

261 questions
insurance
insurance

Coverage: formulary tiers, exclusion versus non-coverage, the difference a diabetes indication makes, employer carve-outs, and what an appeal…

35 questions
dosing-math
dosing-math

The arithmetic itself: milligrams to millilitres to insulin units, concentration after reconstitution, dose per draw, and vial-days per vial. Show…

811 questions
titration
titration

Stepwise dose increases over weeks, why the label schedules exist at all, and what tolerability-driven deviation from a schedule looks like in…

444 questions
shareeditfollowflag
RP
askedrhian_prydderch44k3821 Apr 2026
8Flat monthly pricing across doses is the key asymmetry. You pay the same for month one as month twelve and receive a fraction of the drug. – t_oyelaran 11 days ago
Check whether your plan runs a copay accumulator. It changes the twelve-month total substantially. – Dr_Colm_Fitzhenry 2 months ago
add a comment

3 Answers

Accepted answer first, then by votes
48

Accepted answer

Four prices, four different payers, and only one of them is yours. Then the twelve-month model, which has a genuinely surprising result: on flat monthly pricing you pay roughly the same for the year whether you titrate or not, but the drug you receive differs by about 30%, which means cost per delivered milligram in month one is several times that of month twelve.

Who pays which price

  • List price (WAC in the US). The manufacturer's published price to wholesalers. Almost nobody pays it. Its real function is to be the number everything else is calculated as a discount from, which is why it rises even as net prices fall.
  • Net price. What the manufacturer actually retains after rebates to pharmacy benefit managers, discounts, fees and mandated government pricing. For heavily rebated categories the net can be less than half of list. You cannot access this price and you will never see it on a document; it exists between the manufacturer and the intermediaries, and rebate volume is precisely why a drug can be simultaneously described as extremely expensive and steeply discounted.
  • Plan-negotiated price. What your plan's contract sets for the pharmacy, and the basis for coinsurance. Hardest to obtain in advance; the plan's price-transparency tool is the place to look.
  • Your out-of-pocket. A function of plan design: deductible first, then copay or coinsurance, until an out-of-pocket maximum. A $25 copay card sits on top of that and reduces your share, not the plan's.
  • Manufacturer cash channel. A direct-to-patient price for people paying without insurance. Usually well below list and well above the copay-card figure, and typically excludes anyone whose insurance covers the product.

The trap worth knowing about: copay accumulator and maximiser programmes. Under an accumulator, manufacturer assistance does not count toward your deductible or out-of-pocket maximum. You pay $25 a month while the card lasts, the deductible does not move, and when the annual card limit is exhausted mid-year you land on a full unmet deductible. People budget the $25 across twelve months and meet a four-figure bill in month eight. Ask two questions of your plan: does manufacturer assistance accrue to my deductible, and what is the annual maximum on the card.

Modelling twelve months — semaglutide

Standard obesity titration, four weeks per step: 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, then 2.4 mg weekly as maintenance. Over 52 weeks:

  • Weeks 1–4 at 0.25 mg: 4 × 0.25 = 1.0 mg
  • Weeks 5–8 at 0.5 mg: 4 × 0.5 = 2.0 mg
  • Weeks 9–12 at 1.0 mg: 4 × 1.0 = 4.0 mg
  • Weeks 13–16 at 1.7 mg: 4 × 1.7 = 6.8 mg
  • Weeks 17–52 at 2.4 mg: 36 × 2.4 = 86.4 mg

Total = 1.0 + 2.0 + 4.0 + 6.8 + 86.4 = 100.2 mg for the year. A memorable number: a full year of semaglutide at maximum obesity dosing is almost exactly 100 mg.

Compare against 52 weeks at maintenance from day one: 52 × 2.4 = 124.8 mg. So titration reduces the year's drug by 124.8 − 100.2 = 24.6 mg, i.e. 19.7% less drug — while flat monthly pricing charges you the same. Cost per delivered milligram in month one, at $499 for 4 × 0.25 mg = 1.0 mg, is 499 / 1.0 = $499 per mg, against 499 / 9.6 = $51.98 per mg at maintenance. A ninefold difference for the identical monthly payment.

Modelling twelve months — tirzepatide

Standard escalation, four weeks per step: 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, then 15 mg weekly.

  • Weeks 1–4 at 2.5 mg: 10 mg
  • Weeks 5–8 at 5 mg: 20 mg
  • Weeks 9–12 at 7.5 mg: 30 mg
  • Weeks 13–16 at 10 mg: 40 mg
  • Weeks 17–20 at 12.5 mg: 50 mg
  • Weeks 21–52 at 15 mg: 32 × 15 = 480 mg

Total = 10 + 20 + 30 + 40 + 50 + 480 = 630 mg for the year. Note this is 6.3 times the semaglutide total, which is exactly why cost per milligram cannot be compared across molecules: the potency per milligram is entirely different, and the trials that established each dose used their own schedule [1] [2].

Twelve-month totals

ScenarioMonths 1–4Months 5–1212-month totalPer delivered mg (semaglutide, 100.2 mg)
Brand at list, no coverage4 × $1,349 = $5,3968 × $1,349 = $10,792$16,188$161.56
Manufacturer cash channel, flat4 × $499 = $1,9968 × $499 = $3,992$5,988$59.76
Covered, $25 copay card all year$100$200$300$2.99
Covered, accumulator plan, card exhausted month 7$150$25 × 2 + deductible $2,000 + coinsurance$3,000–$5,000$29.94–$49.90
Compounded subscription, flat4 × $299 = $1,1968 × $299 = $2,392$3,588$35.81

Two conclusions worth carrying away. First, the difference between rows two and three of that table is a factor of twenty, and it is decided by administrative facts about your plan rather than by anything clinical — which is why reading your own plan document is the highest-return hour available. Second, model the accumulator row explicitly. It is the one that ruins budgets, it is invisible at enrolment, and the only way to find out is to ask.

One modelling caveat: reaching and staying at the maximum dose is an assumption, not a given. A paused step or a lower maintenance dose is normal and shifts every number above.

edited 25 May 2026 by nominal_ten — added the citation requested in comments

shareimprove this answerflag
NT
answered · acceptednominal_ten14k178 May 2026
8One hundred milligrams of semaglutide for a year is the number I have been looking for. It reframes every vial-size decision. – threadlock7 6 months ago
The accumulator row is the one that got me. Card ran out in August and the deductible was untouched. – n_takahashi 8 months ago
$499 per mg in month one versus $52 at maintenance, same payment. That is the argument for per-vial pricing in one line. – claudia_ferrante 3 months ago
add a comment
Sponsored

PeptideMeter - Independent Peptide Analytics

Aggregated, published test results and vendor ratings built from submitted batches. Methodology stated, dataset browsable, no listing fees.

Browse results
18

Extending the model in the direction people actually need it: what happens in year two, because a twelve-month model implies the course ends and for most people it does not.

The withdrawal trials are unambiguous that stopping reverses the effect. After a 20-week run-in, participants switched to placebo regained a substantial share of lost weight over the following year while those continuing kept losing [1], and the tirzepatide withdrawal trial reproduced the pattern [2]. Longer-duration data show maintained loss with continued treatment out to two years [3]. So the honest financial model is not a twelve-month course, it is an indefinite one, and the correct question at the outset is not "can I afford a year" but "what is my sustainable annual run rate".

Three things that changes:

  • Year two has no titration. Every month is a maintenance month, so on per-milligram pricing year two costs more drug than year one: 124.8 mg against 100.2 mg for semaglutide, a 24.6% increase. On flat monthly pricing it costs the same. Model whichever applies to you.
  • Reauthorisation risk. Coverage frequently requires a documented response, commonly at least 5% weight loss, to continue. So the year-two budget has a branch in it: continued coverage, or a sudden move to the cash row of the table above. Ask what your plan's reauthorisation criterion is before month twelve, and make sure on-treatment weights are being recorded, because failing reauthorisation for absent documentation rather than absent response is a common and entirely avoidable outcome.
  • Maintenance dose may be lower than maximum. Several people stabilise below the maximum, which lowers the run rate. Worth modelling as a range rather than a point.

A five-year run rate at any of those monthly numbers is a large amount of money, and that arithmetic — rather than a first-month promotion — is the one that should drive the choice of route and the effort put into coverage.

shareimprove this answerflag
DW
answereddeamidation_watch43k3828 Jun 2026
10

Practical notes on getting the number that actually applies to you, since the accepted answer explains the categories but not how to extract your own figure.

  1. Use the plan's price-transparency tool, not the pharmacy counter. Most plans now expose a member cost-estimator that will quote your out-of-pocket for a specific product, strength and pharmacy. That figure incorporates your deductible status, which no one else can see. Run it for the specific presentation and quantity your prescription will be written for; a different strength can sit on a different tier.
  2. Ask the pharmacy for the cash price separately. Occasionally, with a high deductible, the cash price is lower than the insured price. Pharmacies will tell you if asked directly, and in the US pharmacists may no longer be contractually gagged from doing so. Note that a cash purchase generally does not count toward your deductible, which matters if you expect other spending.
  3. Check the quantity the prescription is written for. A 28-day supply against a 30-day supply on a weekly injection changes the annual number of fills from 13 to 12, which is a whole month of cost. Copays are per fill, so fill frequency is a real lever.
  4. Read the card's fine print for the annual maximum and the expiry. Both are usually stated. Multiply the monthly copay by twelve and check it against the annual maximum; if the maximum is lower, you know in advance which month the price changes.
  5. Re-run everything in January. Deductibles reset, formularies change at plan-year boundaries, and a product can move tier or fall off entirely. Budget the first quarter separately from the rest of the year, because that is where the deductible sits.

Doing those five things gives you an actual figure rather than a range, and it takes about an hour. It is also the only way to know which row of the accepted answer's table you are in, which turns out to be the variable with the largest effect on total cost of anything discussed in this topic.

shareimprove this answerflag
DO
answeredDr_Lena_Ostrowska42k3810 May 2026
The 28 versus 30 day supply point is worth a whole month of copay and nobody checks it. – Dr_Signe_Baldursdottir 28 days ago
add a comment

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.