PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

What happens to ecnoglutide after four weeks at 25 °C in solution?

Asked 23 Apr 2024Modified 2.0 years agoViewed 13k times
8

The case in front of me: ecnoglutide · four weeks · 25 °C.

I want to know whether this is a real physical effect or an artefact of how it is measured.

What prompted the question is an inconsistency between two sources I otherwise trust.

What is the causal chain, and where does it stop being established?

peptide-stability
peptide-stability

The chemistry of peptide degradation: deamidation, oxidation, hydrolysis, aggregation and fibrillation, and how temperature, pH, ionic strength,…

908 questions
storage
storage

Storage conditions and their evidence base: minus twenty degrees for powder, refrigerated for solution, protection from light, and what the…

701 questions
shelf-life
shelf-life

How long a preparation remains within specification: labelled expiry for a sealed lyophilised vial, beyond-use dating after reconstitution, and…

327 questions
ecnoglutide
ecnoglutide

A long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist with a cAMP-biased signalling profile. A niche tag, mostly used for mechanism questions about biased agonism…

223 questions
shareeditfollowflag
GH
askedgreta_holzmann23k2723 Apr 2024
5Same situation here, so I will follow this one. – dead_volume 8 months ago
4Is the material lyophilised or already in solution? Completely different answer. – cold_lane 7 months ago
add a comment

5 Answers

Accepted answer first, then by votes
56

Accepted answer

four weeks is 28 days, which at 25 °C is on the order of 112 refrigerated days. 25 °C is 20 kelvin above the 5 °C middle of a 2–8 °C refrigerator. The ten-degree rule of thumb — degradation rate roughly doubling per 10 K — makes that about 4 times the refrigerated rate, which is an order-of-magnitude statement and not a shelf life. In solution the routes that matter are hydrolysis of the backbone, deamidation at Asn, and physical association — the first two cost content, the third costs neither until it precipitates. Over 28 days at 25 °C you should expect all three to have moved, and a purity figure to have noticed only some of them. Reconstituted material has no certificate; the one in the box describes the powder.

Start with the sequence, because which pathways are available depends on which residues are present.

Light exposure matters for tryptophan-containing sequences and for anything with a chromophore. Amber vials and a closed box are free mitigations.

Reported and extrapolated stability by condition

StateConditionUsable windowBasis
Lyophilised solid−20 °C, sealed, dry24–36 monthsSupplier guidance
Lyophilised solid2–8 °C, sealed12–24 monthsSupplier guidance
Lyophilised solid25 °C, sealed4–8 weeksExtrapolated (Arrhenius)
Lyophilised solid40 °C, sealed1–2 weeksExtrapolated
Solution, preserved2–8 °C28 daysUSP microbiological convention
Solution, preserved25 °C3–7 daysExtrapolated
Solution, unpreserved2–8 °C24 hoursUSP microbiological convention

Windows for the solid state are chemical; windows for solution are microbiological and usually shorter than the chemical limit.

A mass spectrum resolves most of this: minus eighteen is dehydration or succinimide, plus one is deamidation, plus sixteen is oxidation, and an unchanged mass with a shifted retention time is an isomer.

Metal-catalysed oxidation of methionine is documented across peptide and protein formulations and is why chelators appear in some formulations.

Nothing here is medical advice, and research-use compounds are not approved for human use.

Sequence decides which pathways are even available. Check the residues.

shareimprove this answerflag
CO
answered · acceptedcoldbox941k13812 May 2024
7Worth adding that residual moisture predicts this better than any printed date. – pierce_count 6 months ago
6The desiccant point is under-appreciated and costs nothing to act on. – ines_brandt 4 months ago
add a comment
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich - Certified Reference Materials

Analytical standards and reagents with traceable certificates. Every quantitative result you read inherits the accuracy of the standard behind it.

Shop standards
67

Mechanically, this is answerable from the chemistry rather than from anecdote, which is unusual and welcome.

Hydrolysis cleaves the backbone, most readily at aspartate-proline and aspartate-glycine sequences, and is acid-catalysed. In a dry solid it barely proceeds at all.

Stated carefully, freeze-thaw cycling drives aggregation through concentration at the ice interface and pH shifts as buffer components crystallise out at different rates. Each cycle costs something.

Sequence determines which pathways apply, so general statements are general.

A mass spectrum names the pathway. Plus one, plus sixteen, minus eighteen.

edited 6 Jun 2024 by coldpack_88 — fixed an arithmetic slip in the third paragraph

shareimprove this answerflag
C8
answeredcoldpack_8850k374 Jun 2024
3Thank you — this is the answer I was looking for. – Dr_Marek_Zielinski 9 months ago
4Small correction: it is the number of cycles rather than the freezer temperature that does the damage. – marta_okonkwo 15 days ago
add a comment
43

Answering this needs the physical state, since a dry powder is protected from most of these and a solution is protected from none.

Aggregation is physical: peptides unfold at air-liquid interfaces and associate. Shaking maximises that interface, which is why swirling and shaking produce visibly different outcomes on the same vial.

The underlying point is that deamidation converts asparagine or glutamine to the corresponding acid via a succinimide intermediate, adding one dalton. It is base-catalysed, accelerates above neutral pH and is the dominant aqueous pathway for many peptides.

Deamidation via the succinimide intermediate is well characterised, with sequence-dependent rates highest for asparagine-glycine motifs.

Apparent loss in a dilute preparation is usually adsorption rather than degradation and is worth ruling out first.

Cold, dry, dark, still. Those four words cover most of the mitigation.

shareimprove this answerflag
LM
answeredleonid_marchuk19k2715 Jun 2024
25

The relevant point is that a mass shift of plus one dalton is deamidation and plus sixteen is oxidation, so degradation is often visible in a mass spectrum if anyone looks.

Oxidation targets methionine, cysteine and tryptophan, adding sixteen daltons per oxygen. It is catalysed by trace metals and promoted by dissolved oxygen and by light.

Adsorption losses at low concentrations are quantified in formulation studies and are the reason carrier proteins are used in dilute preparations.

At dilute concentrations, suspect adsorption before you suspect chemistry.

shareimprove this answerflag
DB
answeredDr_Fatima_Belkacem18k2624 May 2024
6Any published figure for how much a collapsed cake actually retains? – tyndall_haze 21 days ago
add a comment
11

The short version: water enables most of it, oxygen enables oxidation, surfaces enable adsorption, and agitation enables aggregation.

Adsorption onto glass and plastic is significant at low concentrations — micrograms per millilitre — and negligible at milligrams per millilitre. It is the usual explanation for an apparent loss in a dilute preparation.

Aggregation at air-liquid interfaces is established from surface-tension and particle-count studies and is the basis for anti-agitation handling guidance.

Swirl, never shake. Aggregation is a handling problem more than a time problem.

shareimprove this answerflag
DW
answereddeamidation_watch45k5818 Jul 2024
6Two lots stored differently, reassayed at a year — the difference was smaller than I expected. – Dr_Marek_Zielinski 9 months ago
5Adding a vote because this deserves more of them. – Dr_Ingrid_Baumgartner 8 months ago
add a comment

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.