Accepted answer
Answering this needs the magnitude in multiples of the upper reference limit, because the thresholds that matter clinically are defined that way and not in absolute units.
Hy's law describes the combination that matters: transaminases above three times the upper limit together with bilirubin above twice the upper limit and no cholestatic explanation. That combination is a signal; isolated mild transaminase elevation is not.
Headline results, principal programmes
| Trial | Agent | n | Duration | Primary result |
|---|
| STEP 1 | Semaglutide 2.4 mg | 1,961 | 68 wk | −14.9 % vs −2.4 % weight |
| STEP 2 | Semaglutide 2.4 mg, T2DM | 1,210 | 68 wk | −9.6 % vs −3.4 % weight |
| SURMOUNT-1 | Tirzepatide 5/10/15 mg | 2,539 | 72 wk | −15 / −19 / −21 % weight |
| SURMOUNT-4 | Tirzepatide, withdrawal | 670 | 88 wk | Continued loss vs substantial regain |
| SELECT | Semaglutide 2.4 mg | 17,604 | ~40 mo | MACE HR 0.80 (0.72–0.90) |
| FLOW | Semaglutide 1.0 mg, CKD | 3,533 | ~3.4 yr | Renal composite reduced; stopped early |
| SURMOUNT-OSA | Tirzepatide, OSA | 469 | 52 wk | AHI reduced with and without PAP |
Mechanically, reference upper limits around forty units per litre for ALT are conventional rather than physiological; several groups have argued for limits closer to thirty for men and twenty-five for women.
Laboratory-specific reference intervals for transaminases vary enough that cross-laboratory comparison of borderline values is unreliable.
Nothing here is medical advice. An abnormal result needs somebody who can take a history and examine you.
Read the pattern before the magnitude, and the magnitude in multiples of the upper limit.
edited 4 Jan 2026 by Dr_Bram_Verhoeven — fixed an arithmetic slip in the third paragraph
3Worth adding that the collection tube and how long the tourniquet was on move several of these analytes. – Dr_Nadia_Farsi 2 months ago 2Same laboratory every time is advice I ignored for a year, and the series was useless because of it. – Dr_Otto_Lindqvist 17 days ago add a comment