Accepted answer
Week 6 is day 42: on a four-week ladder that is week 2 of dose step 2, and — at the seven-day half-life this class runs on — 6 half-lives in. Steady state is about five half-lives, so day 35 is where the concentration stops climbing on its own. Day 42 is 1 weeks past it, which means the level is no longer the variable. That distinction is most of the question: at week 2 of a step, an effect that is still accumulating is indistinguishable from one that is not resolving unless you know which side of day 35 you are on. Telogen effluvium lags its trigger by roughly three months, which is twelve weeks. Week 6 therefore points at about week 0 as the trigger — which is before the first dose, so the deficit and the agent are not the only candidates and probably not the first ones. Dose decisions are made under supervision, and nothing here is medical advice.
Answering this needs the rate of weight loss and the protein intake, since those are the two modifiable contributors.
The trigger in this context is the rate of weight loss and the associated nutritional deficit, not a pharmacological property. The same phenomenon is well documented after bariatric surgery, illness and childbirth.
Put another way, adequate protein matters. Hair is largely keratin, and follicles are among the most metabolically active tissues, so they are early casualties of a substantial protein shortfall.
The two-to-four-month latency follows directly from the duration of the telogen phase and is the diagnostic feature of the condition.
It resolves in most cases over six to twelve months. That is genuinely the answer.
Confirming that slowing the titration fixed this rather than any of the other things I tried. – triple_agonist_q 2 months ago add a comment