PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

How much protein in grams do I need at 62 kg on 800 kcal a day?

Asked 18 Mar 2025Modified 13 months agoViewed 17k times
20

Numbers first: 62 kg · 800 kcal.

This should be a straightforward calculation and I keep getting two different answers.

The numbers are arbitrary; the method is what I am after.

What is the general form of this calculation?

protein-intake
protein-intake

Protein targets in grams per kilogram, per-meal distribution and the leucine threshold, and the evidence for a higher intake specifically during…

60 questions
nutrition
nutrition

Eating on a suppressed appetite: hitting nutritional targets inside a small energy budget, micronutrient risk, meal structure, and what the trial…

100 questions
lean-mass
lean-mass

Lean body mass as measured rather than assumed: what DEXA, BIA and air-displacement plethysmography each actually estimate, the body-composition…

127 questions
shareeditfollowflag
AP
askedarea_percent9.9k1618 Mar 2025

5 Answers

Accepted answer first, then by votes
10

Accepted answer

99 to 136 g a day. The range the resistance-training literature supports is 1.6 to 2.2 g per kilogram, which at 62 kg is 99–136 g. At 4 kcal per gram that is 397–546 kcal, or 50–68 per cent of a 800 intake — which is why protein has to be planned first at this energy level rather than fitted in afterwards. Split it across three or four servings; roughly 0.4 g/kg per meal saturates the synthetic response and the surplus in one large serving does not carry over.

The honest answer is that most people in a deficit fall well short, and closing that gap matters more than any refinement above it.

Use reference or adjusted body weight rather than total weight where adiposity is substantial: a common approach is ideal body weight plus a quarter of the excess, which avoids targets that no one could eat.

What each body-composition method measures

MethodMeasuresSensitive toLeast significant change
DEXAThree-compartment by attenuationHydration, positioning~2–3 % regional lean
BIA (consumer)Impedance, modelledHydration, food, temperatureNot usable at this timescale
Air displacementTwo-compartment by densityLung volume, hair, clothing~1–2 % fat mass
Tape and scaleCircumference, massTechniqueSurprisingly usable as a trend

Older adults need more per meal to overcome anabolic resistance, with 1.2 to 1.5 g/kg daily commonly quoted for maintenance and more in a deficit.

Meta-analytic estimates place the plateau of the dose-response for lean-mass retention with resistance training around 1.6 g/kg, with a confidence interval extending to about 2.2.

1.6 to 2.2 g/kg of reference weight, split three or four ways. That is the answer.

shareimprove this answerflag
RP
answered · acceptedrhian_prydderch23k2726 Apr 2025
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich - Certified Reference Materials

Analytical standards and reagents with traceable certificates. Every quantitative result you read inherits the accuracy of the standard behind it.

Shop standards
4

The short version: total daily protein first, per-meal distribution second, timing a distant third.

A practical construction: 30 to 40 grams at each of three meals plus a 20 to 30 gram snack covers most targets without any protein powder at all.

It helps to be literal here: high protein intakes do not damage healthy kidneys in the published evidence; existing kidney disease is a genuine exception and is a clinical question.

Stable-isotope feeding studies establish the per-meal saturation of muscle protein synthesis at around 0.4 g/kg in young adults and higher in older ones.

Per-meal saturation is real. One enormous serving does not do the job of three.

edited 8 Apr 2025 by claudia_ferrante — updated for the 2026 guidance change

shareimprove this answerflag
CF
answeredclaudia_ferrante22k2723 Mar 2025
8Adding for future readers: same machine, same time of day, or the series is noise. – marta_okonkwo 14 hours ago
Small correction: lean mass on a scan is not muscle, which this says and people miss. – tenth_of_a_unit 2 months ago
add a comment
4

Start with which body weight the target is calculated from, because using total weight in someone with substantial adiposity inflates the number without benefit.

The leucine threshold for triggering the response is around two and a half to three grams per meal. Thirty grams of most animal protein reaches it; thirty grams of many plant proteins does not, which is why plant-based targets run higher.

More usefully, hydration requirements rise modestly with protein intake because urea excretion increases, which is a real effect and a small one.

Systematic reviews of high-protein intake in people with normal renal function have not found evidence of harm to kidney function.

The caveat is that anyone with chronic kidney disease has a genuinely different protein calculation and needs it done by a clinician.

Plan protein first in the day; with suppressed appetite it will not happen otherwise.

edited 8 Apr 2025 by s_kalniete — tightened the wording; no substantive change

shareimprove this answerflag
SK
answereds_kalniete57k383 Apr 2025
4

The part that matters: the relevant physiology is the per-meal saturation of the synthetic response, which is why one large serving does not substitute for three moderate ones.

Per meal, roughly 0.4 grams per kilogram saturates the synthetic response in most adults, which is about 30 to 40 grams for a typical person. Beyond that the surplus is oxidised or used for other purposes rather than adding to synthesis.

Leucine threshold effects are documented across protein sources and explain the difference in per-serving requirements between animal and plant proteins.

Plant-based patterns need a higher total and more attention per serving.

shareimprove this answerflag
SL
answeredsian_llewellyn65k14718 Jun 2025
-2

Put another way, protein is also the most satiating macronutrient per kilocalorie, which makes hitting the target easier than it sounds once it is prioritised.

Appetite suppression makes protein-rich foods harder to eat because they are satiating. Liquid protein and leaner, less voluminous sources are the usual practical workaround.

The body-composition substudies in the major programmes consistently report that the proportion of weight lost as fat mass is approximately three quarters or better, with the lean-mass fraction falling within the range seen in dietary weight loss of comparable magnitude[1].

Healthy kidneys tolerate this fine. Diseased ones are a clinical question.

shareimprove this answerflag
SL
answeredsian_llewellyn65k14715 Apr 2025

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.