PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

What is the dead-space loss per draw with a 18G drawing needle at 2.5 mg/mL?

Asked 6 Feb 2025Modified 14 months agoViewed 18k times
This question was closed as needing more focus.Closed 21 Feb 2025. Answers already posted are preserved; new answers are not accepted. Questions here should ask one identifiable thing.
20

Details up front: an 18G drawing needle · 2.5 mg/mL.

This should be a straightforward calculation and I keep getting two different answers.

The numbers are arbitrary; the method is what I am after.

What is the general form of this calculation?

dead-space
dead-space

The volume trapped in the syringe hub and needle after the plunger bottoms out. It is small in absolute terms and large as a fraction of a small…

110 questions
insulin-syringe
insulin-syringe

U-100 and U-40 insulin syringes as measuring instruments. A U-100 syringe is graduated in insulin units where 100 units equals 1 mL, so one unit…

268 questions
dosing-math
dosing-math

The arithmetic itself: milligrams to millilitres to insulin units, concentration after reconstitution, dose per draw, and vial-days per vial. Show…

811 questions
shareeditfollowflag
ND
askednynke_dekker18k286 Feb 2025
2Worth adding that the method section is where the answer usually is. – forty_two_c 4 months ago
add a comment

5 Answers

Sorted by votes
36

Dead space is the volume trapped in the syringe hub and needle after the plunger bottoms out, and it is the reason your 10 mg vial yields only 9.5 mg of usable draws.

Low-dead-space syringe designs either have the needle bonded directly to the barrel — a fixed-needle syringe, which is the cheapest route — or add a moulded projection on the plunger tip that fills the luer cone.

Dead space by syringe type

ConfigurationDead volumeLoss at 5 mg/mLOver 20 draws
Fixed-needle insulin syringe3–5 µL15–25 µg0.3–0.5 mg
Low-dead-space, detachable<2 µL<10 µg<0.2 mg
Standard luer-lock + 30G35–60 µL175–300 µg3.5–6 mg
Luer-lock + 21G drawing needle70–100 µL350–500 µg7–10 mg

The luer cone of the syringe plus the needle's own plastic hub accounts for the vast majority of the dead space.

Published inter-laboratory comparisons of dead-space measurements on identical syringes show good agreement, suggesting the numbers are reliable.

The caveat is that dead space is a yield loss and not a dose-accuracy loss, so the person feeling this loss most is the person with the most total draws.

Buy the right syringe — a fixed-needle insulin syringe is cheap and solves the problem.

edited 24 May 2025 by Dr_Yusuf_Adeyemi — removed a claim I could not source

shareimprove this answerflag
DA
answeredDr_Yusuf_Adeyemi95k24824 May 2025
Sponsored

PeptideMeter - Independent Peptide Analytics

Aggregated, published test results and vendor ratings built from submitted batches. Methodology stated, dataset browsable, no listing fees.

Browse results
25

This is arithmetic, so let us do the arithmetic and see where the losses actually are.

Corollary that follows immediately: changing needle gauge or length barely changes your losses.

At 5 mg/mL that is 15 to 25 µg lost per draw on the insulin syringe and 175 to 500 µg on the luer-lock — which over ten draws is the difference between losing a rounding error and losing half a milligram.

The World Health Organisation guidance on injection equipment adopted the same high-versus-low dead-space distinction, using a low-dead-space threshold in the low single-digit microlitres.

Worth noting: draw size matters enormously — the smaller your draws, the more the syringe architecture matters.

The switch nearly doubles your vial, which is better than most other optimisations combined.

shareimprove this answerflag
DB
answeredDr_Aoife_Brennan50k4813 May 2025
5Confirming from the other direction: I did the wrong thing and got exactly the predicted outcome. – bac_or_bust 4 months ago
4Is there a reason to prefer the second method over the first, other than cost? – pascal_thibault 2 months ago
add a comment
20

The single most important fact about dead space is that it is almost entirely in the hub cone, not in the needle, which is why changing needle gauge or length barely changes your losses.

The needle lumen volume is under a microlitre in a typical fine-gauge configuration, so the needle is not the problem.

The relevant detail is that delivered peptide = 10 x 0.5 mg = 5.0 mg. Lost to dead space = 10 x 84 µL = 840 µL x 0.005 = 4.2 mg. Yield = 50 per cent.

I would not underestimate the dead-space cost when calculating your true cost per dose.

If cost matters, this is the first thing to change, not the last.

shareimprove this answerflag
MM
answeredmg_per_ml12k1715 Feb 2025
17

The switch to a low-dead-space syringe nearly doubles your usable vial, which is better than switching suppliers if you are looking for cost savings.

Configuration B — 0.5 mL fixed-needle U-100 insulin syringe, dead space 2 µL: volume removed per draw = 100 + 2 = 102 µL.

Syringe residual volume has been measured properly, mainly in the infection-control literature, with a median residual of about 84 µL for a conventional 1 mL syringe with a detachable needle and roughly 2 µL for a fixed-needle low-dead-space design.

Buy the right syringe — a fixed-needle insulin syringe is cheap and solves the problem.

shareimprove this answerflag
LC
answeredlyoph_cake95k2584 Jun 2025
15

The distinction that resolves most of these questions is understanding that dead space is a fixed volume — typically 3 to 5 µL in a fixed-needle syringe and 35 to 100 µL in a luer-lock — and its cost scales with how small your draws are.

Draws available = 2000 / 102 = 19.6, so 19 full draws. Delivered peptide = 19 x 0.5 mg = 9.5 mg. Lost to dead space = 19 x 2 µL = 38 µL x 0.005 = 0.19 mg. Yield = 95 per cent.

One qualification: the dead space does not affect the dose accuracy if the hub was full of solution at the start of the draw.

The switch nearly doubles your vial, which is better than most other optimisations combined.

shareimprove this answerflag
RS
answeredrota_site55k389 Apr 2025

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.