Accepted answer
To be exact about it, the failure mode here is publishing a result that applies to the tested vial alone while implying it applies to the entire lot.
A statement that "lot 20260412 complies with specifications" is meaningless without stating which vials from the lot were tested and how many there were.
Worth being precise here: if the entire lot failed qualification, a retest on a different vial is sometimes done, but reporting a retest result under the same lot number is misleading.
Published data on lot homogeneity from manufacturers who sample multiple vials consistently find variation below the published specifications, suggesting the sampling plans work.
One qualification: testing more vials gives better confidence, but at some point the cost outweighs the benefit.
Assume segregation is possible, and design your sampling to catch it if it exists.
edited 17 Aug 2026 by plate_count_9k — fixed an arithmetic slip in the third paragraph
5Confirming from the other direction: I did the wrong thing and got exactly the predicted outcome. – Dr_Lena_Ostrowska 15 days ago 6Is there a reason to prefer the second method over the first, other than cost? – deamidation_watch 2 months ago add a comment