PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

How much protein in grams do I need at 74 kg on 1,200 kcal a day?

Asked 11 Feb 2026Modified 4 months agoViewed 16k times
20

For reference: 74 kg · 1,200 kcal.

I would like the arithmetic checked rather than the conclusion asserted.

I have deliberately not used an online calculator because I want to be able to check the result.

Can someone show the working rather than just the answer?

protein-intake
protein-intake

Protein targets in grams per kilogram, per-meal distribution and the leucine threshold, and the evidence for a higher intake specifically during…

60 questions
nutrition
nutrition

Eating on a suppressed appetite: hitting nutritional targets inside a small energy budget, micronutrient risk, meal structure, and what the trial…

100 questions
lean-mass
lean-mass

Lean body mass as measured rather than assumed: what DEXA, BIA and air-displacement plethysmography each actually estimate, the body-composition…

127 questions
shareeditfollowflag
LD
askedloss_on_drying40k13811 Feb 2026

5 Answers

Accepted answer first, then by votes
57

Accepted answer

118 to 163 g a day. The range the resistance-training literature supports is 1.6 to 2.2 g per kilogram, which at 74 kg is 118–163 g. At 4 kcal per gram that is 474–651 kcal, or 39–54 per cent of a 1,200 intake — which is why protein has to be planned first at this energy level rather than fitted in afterwards. Split it across three or four servings; roughly 0.4 g/kg per meal saturates the synthetic response and the surplus in one large serving does not carry over.

Answer first: aim for 1.6 to 2.2 grams per kilogram of reference body weight per day, distributed across three or four servings, and treat it as the first constraint on the day rather than the last.

Use reference or adjusted body weight rather than total weight where adiposity is substantial: a common approach is ideal body weight plus a quarter of the excess, which avoids targets that no one could eat.

The leucine threshold for triggering the response is around two and a half to three grams per meal. Thirty grams of most animal protein reaches it; thirty grams of many plant proteins does not, which is why plant-based targets run higher.

Meta-analytic estimates place the plateau of the dose-response for lean-mass retention with resistance training around 1.6 g/kg, with a confidence interval extending to about 2.2.

Targets are population estimates; individual requirements vary and there is no cheap way to measure yours.

1.6 to 2.2 g/kg of reference weight, split three or four ways. That is the answer.

shareimprove this answerflag
SL
answered · acceptedsian_llewellyn65k14720 Mar 2026
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich - Certified Reference Materials

Analytical standards and reagents with traceable certificates. Every quantitative result you read inherits the accuracy of the standard behind it.

Shop standards
48

The short version: total daily protein first, per-meal distribution second, timing a distant third.

Per meal, roughly 0.4 grams per kilogram saturates the synthetic response in most adults, which is about 30 to 40 grams for a typical person. Beyond that the surplus is oxidised or used for other purposes rather than adding to synthesis.

Hydration requirements rise modestly with protein intake because urea excretion increases, which is a real effect and a small one.

Nothing here is dietetic or medical advice.

Per-meal saturation is real. One enormous serving does not do the job of three.

shareimprove this answerflag
SS
answeredswab_stopper8.8k1331 Mar 2026
23

Plant-based patterns need somewhat higher totals and more attention to leucine content per serving to produce an equivalent response.

A practical construction: 30 to 40 grams at each of three meals plus a 20 to 30 gram snack covers most targets without any protein powder at all.

High protein intakes do not damage healthy kidneys in the published evidence; existing kidney disease is a genuine exception and is a clinical question.

The caveat is that anyone with chronic kidney disease has a genuinely different protein calculation and needs it done by a clinician.

Plant-based patterns need a higher total and more attention per serving.

shareimprove this answerflag
SL
answeredsian_llewellyn65k1478 Mar 2026
4Same experience here, different supplier. – tandem_gradient 2 months ago
add a comment
19

More usefully, protein is also the most satiating macronutrient per kilocalorie, which makes hitting the target easier than it sounds once it is prioritised.

Appetite suppression makes protein-rich foods harder to eat because they are satiating. Liquid protein and leaner, less voluminous sources are the usual practical workaround.

Systematic reviews of high-protein intake in people with normal renal function have not found evidence of harm to kidney function.

Plan protein first in the day; with suppressed appetite it will not happen otherwise.

shareimprove this answerflag
AN
answeredamara_nwachukwu20k2725 Feb 2026
Thank you — reframing progression as maintained performance was genuinely useful. – kwn_analytical 8 months ago
8The point about protein being hardest to eat exactly when it matters most is well made. – tare_weight 6 months ago
add a comment
18

The honest answer is that most people in a deficit fall well short, and closing that gap matters more than any refinement above it.

Older adults need more per meal to overcome anabolic resistance, with 1.2 to 1.5 g/kg daily commonly quoted for maintenance and more in a deficit.

Leucine threshold effects are documented across protein sources and explain the difference in per-serving requirements between animal and plant proteins.

Healthy kidneys tolerate this fine. Diseased ones are a clinical question.

shareimprove this answerflag
RC
answeredRP_C18105k34814 Feb 2026
Any published number for how long the counter-regulatory response persists? – j_wierzbicki 6 months ago
add a comment

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.