PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

My liraglutide vial sat at 37 °C for fourteen days — is testing worth it before use?

Asked 16 Aug 2024Modified 21 months agoViewed 20k times
17

For reference: liraglutide · 37 °C · fourteen days.

I am at the decision point and I would rather think it through than improvise.

I would rather spend money on measurement than on redundancy.

How do I make this decision on evidence rather than on feel?

cold-chain
cold-chain

Keeping material within a temperature window from manufacture to use: phase-change packs versus dry ice, thermal mass, transit-lane temperature…

578 questions
peptide-stability
peptide-stability

The chemistry of peptide degradation: deamidation, oxidation, hydrolysis, aggregation and fibrillation, and how temperature, pH, ionic strength,…

908 questions
batch-testing
batch-testing

Testing at the batch or lot level: sampling plans, how many vials from a lot need testing to say anything about the lot, and the difference…

910 questions
liraglutide
liraglutide

A once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist and the compound that established the class. Still relevant for its shorter half-life, its paediatric and…

235 questions
shareeditfollowflag
FU
askedforty_units16k1716 Aug 2024

4 Answers

Accepted answer first, then by votes
71

Accepted answer

Fourteen days at 37 °C is about 129 refrigerated days of equivalent exposure. 37 °C is 32 kelvin above the 5 °C middle of a 2–8 °C refrigerator. The ten-degree rule of thumb — degradation rate roughly doubling per 10 K — makes that about 9.2 times the refrigerated rate, which is an order-of-magnitude statement and not a shelf life. At 129 equivalent days a test is more likely to reassure you than to tell you something, which is a legitimate reason to run it and a poor reason to expect a finding. Either way, record the fourteen days and the temperature now, while you still know them; an excursion you did not write down is an excursion you cannot interpret later.

The short version: a spent cold pack on arrival is expected, the solid does not mind, and the pack was never going to last twelve days.

Arrhenius behaviour means the degradation rate roughly doubles per ten degrees. A week at thirty degrees is therefore a meaningful exposure for a solution and an immaterial one for a dry solid.

On the detail: once the parcel arrives, the domestic leg is the controllable part: get it into the refrigerator promptly rather than leaving it in a warm hallway for a day.

Phase-change pack hold time is a function of mass, latent heat and insulation, and published figures for small parcels are on the order of one to two days.

The caveat is that a warm transit is survivable for a solid and materially different for a solution.

Lyophilised tolerates the lane. That is the answer for almost every order.

shareimprove this answerflag
MO
answered · acceptedmarta_okonkwo190k2587 Oct 2024
2Small correction: it is the number of cycles rather than the freezer temperature that does the damage. – a_lindgren 6 months ago
add a comment
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical - Independent Third-Party Testing

HPLC purity, identity confirmation and quantified content on the vial you actually hold. Reports arrive with the chromatogram attached, not just a number.

Submit a sample
Sponsored — paired listing

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. - Direct Synthesis

Founded 1998. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff and 200+ patents. The synthesis house behind a great many of the vials that get sent out for testing - batch-specific documentation with every order.

Visit GL Biochem
85

The honest answer is that the cold pack is doing much less than people think and that shipping lyophilised is what actually protects the material.

A single-use temperature logger costs a few pounds, records the whole journey and converts an argument into a record. If the history matters, this is the answer.

Asking a supplier to hold a shipment during a heatwave is reasonable and the better ones agree; the cost is a week and the benefit is a shorter warm exposure for anything in solution.

A cold pack tells you nothing about the eleven days before the last one.

Buy a logger if you actually want to know. Everything else is inference.

shareimprove this answerflag
DC
answeredDr_Idris_Coulibaly33k13729 Oct 2024
3Adding a vote because this deserves more of them. – Dr_Ilse_Vandenberg 34 days ago
add a comment
58

It helps to be literal here: the domestic leg after arrival is the part most often left in a warm hallway and least often worried about.

A pack that arrived hard tells you about the last day of transit only, since it will have melted and, if the ambient dropped, partially refrozen.

Stated carefully, that is the argument for shipping lyophilised rather than for shipping colder. A dry powder with low residual moisture is stable at ambient for months; the pathways that matter need water.

Single-use temperature loggers are standard practice in supply chains where temperature genuinely matters and are inexpensive at parcel scale.

The domestic leg is the part you control. Refrigerate it promptly.

edited 29 Oct 2024 by Dr_Ilse_Vandenberg — added the method parameters

shareimprove this answerflag
DV
answeredDr_Ilse_Vandenberg113k24818 Oct 2024
8Does the same reasoning apply to material already in solution, or is that a different curve? – Dr_Nadia_Farsi 10 months ago
7Adding for future readers: the domestic leg after delivery is the part you control. – rhian_prydderch 8 months ago
add a comment
34

Start with the physical state, because it changes the answer completely and is the first thing to establish.

A single phase-change pack in a thin-walled box holds below ten degrees for roughly one to two days at twenty-five degrees ambient, and under a day at thirty-five. On a nine-to-fourteen-day lane the material is at ambient for most of the journey whatever was packed with it.

Solid-state stability of lyophilised peptides at ambient temperature is documented in formulation studies with residual moisture as the dominant variable.

Nothing here is medical advice, and research-use compounds are not approved for human use.

A liquefied pack is expected. It is not evidence of a problem.

shareimprove this answerflag
PC
answeredpierce_count24k3826 Sept 2024

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.