5
Numbers first: a GLP-1 receptor agonist · sixteen weeks · minus 80 °C.
I suspect the usual explanation for this is wrong, or at least incomplete.
I am aware this may have a boring answer. I would still like the boring answer stated clearly.
Can someone derive this rather than assert it?
shareeditfollowflag
Good answer, but the confidence interval in the cited trial is wider than implied. – micron22 3 months ago
add a comment