Accepted answer
Nobody has published a cycle count, and at 2.5 mg/mL the concentration tells you what a wrong guess costs: a 0.1 mL aliquot holds 0.25 mg and every microlitre is 2.5 µg. Damage from freezing is not gradual attrition — it is concentrated at the phase transitions, where ice excludes solute and the unfrozen fraction climbs well above 2.5 mg/mL for as long as the transition lasts. Two slow cycles can therefore do more than four fast ones, which is why a cycle count is the wrong unit in the first place. The way to make the number one is to make it one: split at reconstitution into single-draw aliquots, label each with 2.5 mg/mL and the date, and never thaw a container you will refreeze.
The short version: aliquot before freezing, thaw slowly, never refreeze a thawed aliquot, and count your cycles.
The mitigation is aliquoting. Divide the reconstituted solution into single-use volumes before the first freeze, and each aliquot then experiences exactly one cycle.
A dry lyophilised powder is much less affected by a temperature cycle because there is no liquid phase for anything to concentrate into. Condensation on a cold vial opened warm is the real risk there.
Cryoconcentration of solutes at the ice front is a well-documented mechanism in freeze-thaw damage to proteins and peptides.
The caveat is that aggregation is invisible in a clear solution below the threshold where it becomes visible.
Dry powder tolerates cycles far better than solution does.
edited 21 Jun 2026 by greta_holzmann — reworded for clarity after a comment
5This should be linked from the help pages. – marta_okonkwo 12 days ago add a comment