PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

What did ESSENCE actually show on fibrosis?

Asked 13 Apr 2024Modified 2.3 years agoViewed 31k times
23

The clinician who ordered the panel was not concerned; I would still like to understand it.

I would like help reading this properly rather than being told what conclusion to reach.

I have the full report including the method section, so I can quote specifics if that helps.

What would I need in addition before this supported a decision?

mash
mash

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: histological endpoints, resolution without worsening fibrosis, fibrosis improvement by stage,…

51 questions
clinical-trials
clinical-trials

Reading the primary literature properly: estimands, intention-to-treat versus per-protocol, confidence intervals, absolute versus relative…

913 questions
liver-enzymes
liver-enzymes

ALT, AST, GGT and ALP: what they do and do not indicate about hepatic fat, why enzymes are a poor surrogate for histology, and where non-invasive…

50 questions
shareeditfollowflag
CC
askedcake_collapsed13k2813 Apr 2024
6This is the first explanation of that which has actually made sense to me. – anouk_desmet 3 months ago
7Note that the label instructions differ between agents on precisely this point. – n_takahashi 4 months ago
add a comment

No answers yet

This question has not been answered. It has been viewed 31k times, which suggests the question is of interest and the answer is not obvious. If you can answer it with a source or a worked calculation, it will be read. See how to ask and answer.
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich - Certified Reference Materials

Analytical standards and reagents with traceable certificates. Every quantitative result you read inherits the accuracy of the standard behind it.

Shop standards

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.