Take it from the SURMOUNT-1 adverse-event table by arm, and check the unit before you use it. An incidence can be the proportion of participants who reported the event at least once, or the count of events divided by exposure time, and the two differ by however many people had it repeatedly. Then subtract the placebo arm, because the untreated rate is not zero. And read the discontinuation column beside it: an event that made people leave the trial is under-counted at every later visit, so a low late-timepoint incidence can mean the event was severe rather than rare.
Put another way, the relevant risk chain is vomiting to volume depletion to reduced renal perfusion to a rising creatinine, which is how most acute renal events in this class occur.
Trial incidence for vomiting runs at roughly a third to a half of the nausea rate depending on agent and dose, and it is more concentrated in the escalation phase than nausea is.
More usefully, oral rehydration solutions work by glucose-coupled sodium co-transport, which continues to function when secretion is deranged. That is why the glucose-to-sodium ratio matters and a high-sugar sports drink is not equivalent.
Vomiting rates in the trial programmes are reported separately from nausea and are consistently lower and more dose-dependent.
Anti-emetics interact with other medication and are a prescriber decision.
Rinse rather than brush after an episode. Enamel is not replaceable.
7This should be linked from the help pages. – orla_ferriter 5 months ago add a comment