Page 7 of 8 · 186 questions tagged customs.
Setup, so nobody has to ask: Suzhou · the United States. I would like help reading this properly rather than being told what conclusion to reach. I have the full…
Setup, so nobody has to ask: Suzhou · Canada. I would like help reading this properly rather than being told what conclusion to reach. I have the full report…
Details up front: Tianjin · Ireland. I can parse the result. I am less sure what it licenses me to conclude. I have deliberately not looked at anyone else’s…
The case in front of me: Nantong · Australia. The figures are clear enough; the question is what they mean and what they do not. I can supply the numbers if the…
Conditions: Guangzhou · Norway. The figures are clear enough; the question is what they mean and what they do not. I can supply the numbers if the specifics change…
Concretely: Finland · seven days. I have two candidate explanations and no way to distinguish them. The same procedure has worked without incident several times…
Conditions: the Netherlands · twenty-eight days. I think I have a problem. I am not yet sure whether it is a real problem or a measurement artefact. I want to know…
What I have: Zhuhai · Poland. I can parse the result. I am less sure what it licenses me to conclude. I have deliberately not looked at anyone else’s interpretation…
Conditions: Chengdu · Japan. I would like to know the limits of what can be inferred from this. What I am trying to avoid is over-reading a single result, which I…
Stated plainly: Chengdu · Spain. I have read the primary source rather than the summary, which has left me with more questions. I understand the headline. I do not…
The case in front of me: Chengdu · Germany. I would like to know the limits of what can be inferred from this. What I am trying to avoid is over-reading a single…
The lane and the lead time matter as much as the material for what I am doing. I can parse the result. I am less sure what it licenses me to conclude. I have…
What I have: Changsha · Poland. I can parse the result. I am less sure what it licenses me to conclude. I have deliberately not looked at anyone else’s interpretation…
The case in front of me: Nantong · Germany. I would like to know the limits of what can be inferred from this. What I am trying to avoid is over-reading a single…
Numbers first: Wuxi · Singapore. This is presented as though it settles something, and I am not convinced it does. I have two documents that appear to disagree, which…
Numbers first: Xi’an · Poland. I can parse the result. I am less sure what it licenses me to conclude. I have deliberately not looked at anyone else’s interpretation…
The particulars: Tianjin · South Africa. I want to understand what this actually establishes, as opposed to what it is being used to imply. My concern is that I am…
Numbers first: Hangzhou · Singapore. This is presented as though it settles something, and I am not convinced it does. I have two documents that appear to disagree,…
For reference: Norway · ten days. An unexpected observation, and I would like a differential rather than reassurance. The conditions were within what I understood to…
For reference: Xi’an · New Zealand. I have the document in front of me and I can read the numbers. What I cannot do is interpret them. I am reasonably comfortable…
For reference: Australia · ten days. An unexpected observation, and I would like a differential rather than reassurance. The conditions were within what I understood…
I would rather spend on verification than on volume. The figures are clear enough; the question is what they mean and what they do not. I can supply the numbers if…
I have kept every message, invoice and document, which I gather is the useful habit. This is presented as though it settles something, and I am not convinced it does.…
Numbers first: Tianjin · the United Kingdom. This is presented as though it settles something, and I am not convinced it does. I have two documents that appear to…